Danamma vs. Amar 2018 | Case Summary

In the Supreme Court of India Decided on February 1, 2018 Bench: Dr. A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan Citation:(2018) 3 SCC 343 Appellant: Danamma Alias Suman Surpur and Another Respondent: Amar and Others Introduction The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 that codified intestate succession among Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs suffered from the problem of being […]

The post Danamma vs. Amar 2018 | Case Summary appeared first on Law Times Journal.

Popular posts from this blog

Sehgal School of Competition vs Dalbir Singh

In the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi. Decided on 30th April, 2009. Appeal no: FA-08/1043 (Arising out of Order dated 10-10-2008 passed by District Forum, Janakpuri, New Delhi, in Complaint No. 161/2007) Appellant: Sehgal school of competition Respondent: Shri Dalbir Singh Bench: Hon’ble Justice J.D Kapoor Background: The Consumer Protection Act: Established in 1986, […] The post Sehgal School of Competition vs Dalbir Singh appeared first on Law Times Journal .
Read more

Punjab and Haryana High Court disposes of PIL seeking phasing-out of alcohol sale in Punjab

Image
The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed seeking phasing-out of the sale of alcohol in the State of Punjab based on certain reports obtained by it. The PIL has been filed by one legal trust. After arguing at length, the Petitioner prayed for and is permitted by the High Court to approach the respondent-authorities by filing a detailed representation as it has not done so till date. Avinit Avasthi, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, submitted before the High Court that in case the petitioner does so, the respondent-authorities shall look into the matter and take a decision thereon in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid, the Division Bench of Chief Justice Ravi Shanker Jha and Justice Arun Palli disposed of the Petition. The post Punjab and Haryana High Court disposes of PIL seeking phasing-out of alcohol sale in Punjab appeared first on India Legal . from India Legal https://ift.tt/f0HZxRz
Read more

Madras High Court lawyers follow suit with Gujarat, Telangana counterparts, oppose Supreme Court Collegium’s transfer decision

Image
Following in the footsteps of their counterparts in Gujarat and Telangana, the Madras High Court Advocates Association (MHCAA) has raised ‘strong objection’ to the Supreme Court Collegium’s decision to transfer judges from one High Court to another.  In a letter written to Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud on Friday, the organisation opposed transfer of Madras High Court Acting Chief Justice T Raja to the Rajasthan High Court, alleging that such proposals looked like the person was being disincentivised for being an efficient and decent judicial officer, holding the highest post in the state judiciary.  As per MHCAA President G. Mohana Krishnan, since September 22, 2022, when Justice Raja took over as the Acting Chief Justice of Madras High Court, he has maintained the highest decorum. Calling him a ‘people’s judge,’ who rendered justice irrespective of the person arguing the case, the MHCAA chief said that the transfer order just a...
Read more