The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice on a petition seeking directions for the Central government to permit citizens residing outside India, to exercise their franchise under Section 20A of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, from their place of residence or employment. A Bench headed by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana issued notice on the petition filed by the Kerala Pravasi Association. The petition sought alternative options/external modes to be provided to the citizens residing outside India for exercising their right to vote, without insisting on their physical presence in their respective polling stations in India on the day of polling. The post Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking voting rights for NRIs appeared first on India Legal . from India Legal https://ift.tt/JDfwj2F
In the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi. Decided on 30th April, 2009. Appeal no: FA-08/1043 (Arising out of Order dated 10-10-2008 passed by District Forum, Janakpuri, New Delhi, in Complaint No. 161/2007) Appellant: Sehgal school of competition Respondent: Shri Dalbir Singh Bench: Hon’ble Justice J.D Kapoor Background: The Consumer Protection Act: Established in 1986, […] The post Sehgal School of Competition vs Dalbir Singh appeared first on Law Times Journal .
After being arrested for allegedly fabricating documents to frame high ranking officials and the then CM of Gujarat Narendra Modi in Gujarat Riots of 2002,the Human Right activist Teesta Setalvad has moved to the Supreme Court seeking bail. The Gujarat High Court on August 2 this year, issued notice to the Special Investigation Team (SIT) asking it to respond to the bail applications filed by Setalvad and former Gujarat Director General of Police (DGP) RB Sreekumar. The High court has put this matter to be heard on September 19.The Human Right activist has taken objection for such a long gap for her hearing and has appealed before the Apex court. Teesta cited a judgement of Supreme Court (Satendar Kumar Antil v. CBI, bail matters) which says thy a case must be heard expeditiously. The plea said that “Despite the same, the first date fixed by Hon’ble High Court in the present case is after one and a half months.” The appeal was put before a Bench ...