AI Hallucinations in the Courtroom: Examining Lawyer and Judicial Liability for AI-Generated Fake Case Citations in India

Introduction Generative artificial intelligence has entered the Indian courtroom not through any statute or judicial rule, but through the laptop of the overworked advocate and the research desk of the understaffed judge. Tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot answer legal queries with the confident fluency of a senior counsel, complete with citations formatted exactly as they would appear in the Supreme Court Cases or All India Reporter series. The difficulty is that a meaningful share of those citations do not […]

The post AI Hallucinations in the Courtroom: Examining Lawyer and Judicial Liability for AI-Generated Fake Case Citations in India appeared first on Law Times Journal.

Popular posts from this blog

Criminal proceedings against encroachment on land of Gram Sabha can be taken together under Section 67 of Revenue Code: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court on September 23 said that criminal proceedings against encroachment on the land of Gram Sabha can be taken together under Section 67 of the Revenue Code, under Section 3/4 of the Prevention of Damage to Civil and Public Property Act. A Single Bench of Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava passed this order, while hearing an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by one Srikant, seeking to quash the charge sheet dated May 14, 2015 as well as the cognizance order dated April 6, 2016 and also the entire proceedings of case under Section 3/4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1894, registered at Police Station Jigna, District Mirzapur, pending before the 4th Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mirzapur. The records of the case indicate that the criminal proceedings were initiated, pursuant to an FIR dated March 26, 2015 lodged against the applicant, which was registered as case under Section 3/4 of PDPP ...
Read more

Touching private parts of minor, kissing on lips does not amount to offence under Section 177 of IPC: Bombay High Court

Image
The Bombay High Court has observed that touching private parts of a minor and kissing on lips do not amount to unnatural offence under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. A Single-Judge Bench of Justice Anuja Prabhudessai made the remarks, while granting bail to an accused, after noting that the POCSO offences with which the accused was charged, were punishable with maximum imprisonment up to five years and the accused had been in custody for almost a year. It noted that the statement of the victim as well as the First Information Report prima facie indicated that the Applicant had touched the private parts of the victim and had kissed his lips. Section 377 defines unnatural offences as voluntarily having carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal and the punishment is imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description for a term extending up to 10 years, noted the Bench. It added that the section clarifies that penetratio...
Read more

Internship Opportunity at Athena Law Associates

About the Internship :Applications are invited for the position of Assessment Intern in the Indirect Tax Litigation practice at Athena Law Associates. The internship offers exposure to matters relating to GST, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy, and other allied laws. Based on performance during the internship, candidates may be considered for a permanent position with the firm […] The post Internship Opportunity at Athena Law Associates appeared first on Law Times Journal .
Read more